Follow
The Money
By
Scott Hensley
Wall Street Journal - May 11, 2003
Insurers Help Patients Get
Their Drug Regimens Right
Evidence is building that the health-care system
needs to do a better job of getting people's prescription-drug
regimens right. Now, health insurers are starting
to help patients deal with the problem.
A recent study highlights the issue. More than
one in ten patients in ill health said they received
either the wrong medicine or a mistaken dose during
the past two years, according to the survey. The
research, conducted in five English-speaking countries,
including the U.S., focused on the experience
of vulnerable patients with their health-care
systems because they are sensitive indicators
of quality. (Patients included those who rated
their health as fair or poor, had a recent serious
illness or injury or had been hospitalized for
reasons other than a normal baby delivery. See
the
study.)
In the U.S., 12% of these sicker patients reported
medication problems. Among patients taking four
or more medicines regularly, the mistake rate
was higher in all the surveyed countries and stood
at 16% in the U.S. More than one third of the
Americans surveyed took four or more drugs.
Researchers from Harvard University, the Commonwealth
Fund in New York and Harris Interactive, a polling
concern, conducted the survey, whose results appear
in the current issue of policy journal Health
Affairs. (The Online Journal conducts health-care
polls with Harris Interactive.)
The findings are consistent with a growing body
of medical research and common sense. Prescription-drug
problems are widespread, and your chances of trouble
are higher if you take more drugs.
Perhaps the most worrisome news is that 30% of
U.S. patients surveyed (and even more elsewhere)
say their main physician failed to review and
discuss all the medications they were taking during
the past two years.
Some insurers think they can help patients with
this problem, and save themselves money in the
process, by conducting prescription-drug review
programs. Typically, a pharmacist for the insurer
reviews a patient's prescriptions and medical
record, looking for mistakenly prescribed medicines,
potential interactions, drug duplications or signs
of side effects. The pharmacist may also recommend
adding a medicine for conditions that aren't adequately
treated. The pharmacist usually talks with the
patient's doctor about concerns or changes and
then discusses the revised regimen with the patient.
Ruth Yuil, a 64-year-old sales consultant at
a Marshall Field's department store outside Detroit,
is one of the beneficiaries of such an approach.
Ms. Yuil's health insurer, Health Alliance Plan,
identified her as vulnerable to medication problems
because claims data showed she was taking eight
prescription medicines.
Nearly three years ago, the health plan, owned
by the Henry Ford Health System, began systematically
reviewing the medicines of patients taking five
or more drugs. Last year, Lesia Stebelski, a pharmacist
working for HAP, checked Ms. Yuil's medicines
and recommended switching her to osteoporosis
fighter Fosamax from Evista and substituting Tylenol
for Vioxx to reduce the water that Ms. Yuil was
retaining.
Ms. Yuil suffers from heart failure, which means
that even a small buildup of fluid could strain
her weakened heart and send her to the hospital.
Fluid build up is a side effect of Evista and
Vioxx in some people. "I had no idea how
much I was at risk," Ms. Yuil says.
After the changes, Ms. Yuil lost weight and felt
better, except for nagging arthritis pain that
flared when her Vioxx was stopped. (Recently,
she began a trial prescription with Darvocet-N,
another pain reliever.) She also stopped taking
Allegra for her allergies, at Ms. Stebelski's
suggestion, because it duplicated another allergy
medicine, Rhinocort Aqua, already on her list.
Thanks to the changes, Ms. Yuil is on track to
save more than $700 in drug co-payments this year.
Barbara Zarowitz, vice president of pharmacy
care at HAP and Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit,
says her staff of pharmacists screens out drug
duplications, dangerous combinations and incorrect
doses. "Safety has been improved, and if
you eliminate unnecessary drugs you're reducing
costs," she says. Ms. Zarowitz estimates
that, by the end of 2004, the health plan will
have saved $4.5 million. More than 8,000 medication
reviews were performed last year, and the number
of patients on five or more medicines has fallen
by half among those whose records have been checked.
Starting three years ago, Kaiser Permanente,
the integrated health insurer and care provider,
began aggressively assessing the prescription
medicines being taken by new members to its plan
in Colorado.
A Kaiser pharmacist talks with each new member
about his or her medicines, usually calling the
patient at home, where he or she can read labels
on bottles in bathroom cabinets to make sure nothing
is overlooked. The conversations about the patient's
drug regimen can last as long as 45 minutes, says
Kent Nelson, pharmacy services director for Kaiser's
Colorado region.
Some 40,000 patients have had their medications
reviewed this way. And the staff of pharmacists
working on these intake exams and other drug-quality
projects has grown to 10 from three in 2000.
"It's not uncommon for a new Medicare member
to come in on 12 medications and leave on seven,"
Mr. Nelson says. While the prevention of bad outcomes
is hard to document, Mr. Nelson is confident the
attention is paying off. One measure he cites
is positive feedback from members. "They
say often that they've never understood why they
take all the medicines that they do," he
says.
Insurers can help themselves financially by eliminating
drugs that patients don't need. But could HMOs
go too far in their zeal and shortchange members?
"One can only hope that the patient's best
interest is always being served," says Evelyn
Hermes-DeSantis, a pharmacist and clinical associate
professor of pharmacy at Rutgers University. "As
long as a pharmacist acts in his or her professional
capacity, then there shouldn't be a problem,"
she says. And doctors, of course, must approve
any medication changes before they're made.
The bigger risk is sticking with the status quo.
Prescription drugs are invaluable aids for healthier
living. But, as with many tools, pills used carelessly
can cause more harm than good.
|